<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Netputing &#187; Intel Corporation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://netputing.com/tag/intel-corporation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://netputing.com</link>
	<description>Puting up with the Net</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 18:25:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NetbookInstaller Plans for 0.8.4</title>
		<link>http://netputing.com/2010/01/04/netbookinstaller-plans-for-0-8-4/</link>
		<comments>http://netputing.com/2010/01/04/netbookinstaller-plans-for-0-8-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 15:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[64bit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Installation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netputing.com/?p=378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In a recent post Meklort stated that he will focus on simplifying the installation experience even more for the 0.8.4 release. his main goal is to make NetbookBootMaker supported on multiple platforms (or a version of it for each).</p>
<p>Many users on the MyDellMini forum have installed using Mechdrew&#8217;s NetbookCD and related guides. At the moment, NetbookCD [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://netputingcdn2.appspot.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/dellmini9.png"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-90" title="dellmini9" src="http://netputingcdn2.appspot.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/dellmini9-150x150.png" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>In a recent post Meklort stated that he will focus on simplifying the installation experience even more for the 0.8.4 release. his main goal is to make NetbookBootMaker supported on multiple platforms (or a version of it for each).</p>
<p>Many users on the MyDellMini forum have installed using <a href="http://osx.mechdrew.com/guides/nbi3.shtml">Mechdrew&#8217;s NetbookCD</a> and related guides. At the moment, NetbookCD can patch an OS X install DVD at runtime by using a special kext and a console version of NetbookBootMaker. This will be incorporated into <strong>both</strong> NetbookInstaller as well as NetbookBootMaker.</p>
<p>The following changes are planned (some already completed or in progress):</p>
<ul>
<li>NetbookBootMaker is in the process of being rewritten. It will no longer patch the installation dvd, instead NetbookBootMaker will install a postboot ramdisk (as with NetbookCD) that will patch the dvd (or usb drive) at runtime. This means that tiger  will be a supported host OS.</li>
<li>NetbookBootMaker will be ported to Windows (using <a href="http://www.cocotron.org/">Cocotron</a>). NetbookBootMaker will be able to at least create both usb devices used for the two usb install method, although I&amp;apos;m also planning on getting it working with just one usb drive.</li>
<li>Look into creating an app for Linux, however creating the usb drives can easily be done already.</li>
<li>NetbookInstaller will automatically be run after a system update. A modified chameleon will run NetbookInstaller (via a ramdisk) if it detects the /System/Library/Extensions.mkext is newer than /Extra/Extensions.mkext. This should only happen if the user installs an OS update, or installs a kext to /S/L/E.</li>
<li>NetbookInstaller and NetbookBootMaker will support 64bit targets. The main reason for the 64bit support is for the new Atom cpus from Intel, as well as netbooks with the Atom 330 cpu.</li>
</ul>
<p>In other words 0.8.4 will focus on unifying the various installation methods so that a common code base can be used, as well as to simplify the amount of work a user needs to do to install OS X.</p>
<p>Since 10.5 is no longer in development, NetbookInstaller will no longer support Leopard. You can use an older version, such as 0.8.3. This is being done to simplify application as well as to reduce the download size.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.meklort.com/?p=151">NetbookInstaller Plans (Specifically 0.8.4) « Meklort&#8217;s Blog</a>.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/e5234f8b-de6e-4a3f-a8d5-9eb3ab08d70a/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=e5234f8b-de6e-4a3f-a8d5-9eb3ab08d70a" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://netputing.com/2010/01/04/netbookinstaller-plans-for-0-8-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NetbookInstaller 0.8.3 Released</title>
		<link>http://netputing.com/2010/01/04/netbookinstaller-0-8-3-released-and-merry-christmas-%c2%ab-meklorts-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://netputing.com/2010/01/04/netbookinstaller-0-8-3-released-and-merry-christmas-%c2%ab-meklorts-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 15:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holidays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merry Christmas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netputing.com/?p=373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>NetbookInstaller 0.8.3 is now officially released. Lots of changes from 0.8.2. Look at the change log for details.</p>
<p>This release is essentially 0.8.3 RC5, plus a couple of minor tweaks. Those changes include</p>

Bootloader banner is disabler (no longer displays chameleon string in upper right)
Bootloader no longer blacks out screen before showing the boot logo.
Various extra error checking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://netputingcdn2.appspot.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/dellmini9.png"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-90" title="dellmini9" src="http://netputingcdn2.appspot.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/dellmini9-150x150.png" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>NetbookInstaller 0.8.3 is now officially released. Lots of changes from 0.8.2. Look at the <a href="http://code.google.com/p/netbook-installer/wiki/NetbookInstaller_ChangeLog#0.8.3">change log</a> for details.</p>
<p>This release is essentially 0.8.3 RC5, plus a couple of minor tweaks. Those changes include</p>
<ul>
<li>Bootloader banner is disabler (no longer displays chameleon string in upper right)</li>
<li>Bootloader no longer blacks out screen before showing the boot logo.</li>
<li>Various extra error checking especially when related to DSDT generation.</li>
</ul>
<p>Grab the files below:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://netbook-installer.googlecode.com/files/NetbookBootMaker%200.8.3.app.zip">NetbookBootMaker 0.8.3</a></li>
<li><a href="http://netbook-installer.googlecode.com/files/NetbookInstaller%200.8.3.app.zip">NetbookInstaller 0.8.3</a></li>
</ul>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>There are lots of fun changes planed for 0.8.4, it basically involves better support for more machines as well as support for <a class="zem_slink" title="64-bit" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/64-bit">64bit</a> machines (esp since <a class="zem_slink" title="Intel" rel="homepage" href="http://www.intel.com/">Intel</a>&#8216;s newest <a class="zem_slink" title="Intel Atom" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Atom">Atom</a> is 64bit).</p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.meklort.com/?p=149">NetbookInstaller 0.8.3 Released (and Merry Christmas) « Meklort&#8217;s Blog</a>.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/b263a4ed-9df2-4a68-865b-e30abcd8df30/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=b263a4ed-9df2-4a68-865b-e30abcd8df30" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://netputing.com/2010/01/04/netbookinstaller-0-8-3-released-and-merry-christmas-%c2%ab-meklorts-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HP Mini 311 First Test Results: Is Ion Worth It?</title>
		<link>http://netputing.com/2009/10/06/hp-mini-311-first-test-results-is-ion-worth-it/</link>
		<comments>http://netputing.com/2009/10/06/hp-mini-311-first-test-results-is-ion-worth-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIni 311]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netputing.com/?p=306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It’s here, and it could redefine netbooks. The HP Mini 311, with Nvidia’s Ion LE Graphics chips are responsible for processing all images sent to your computer?s display.</p>
<p>Learn Moregraphics chip inside, arrived in our offices today. But how good is it?</p>
<p>For months you’ve been hearing that Ion will improve graphics performance on mini-notebooks and offer better [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span id="intelliTXT"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-20419" title="HP Mini 311" src="http://blog.laptopmag.com/wpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/HP-Mini-311-02.jpg" alt="HP Mini 311" width="250" /></span>It’s here, and it could redefine netbooks. The <a class="zem_slink" title="Hewlett-Packard" rel="homepage" href="http://www.hp.com">HP</a> Mini 311, with <a class="zem_slink" title="Nvidia" rel="geolocation" href="http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=37.3707277778,-121.963738889&amp;spn=0.01,0.01&amp;q=37.3707277778,-121.963738889%20%28Nvidia%29&amp;t=h">Nvidia</a>’s Ion LE Graphics chips are responsible for processing all images sent to your computer?s display.</p>
<p>Learn Moregraphics chip inside, arrived in our offices today. But how good is it?</p>
<p>For months you’ve been hearing that Ion will improve graphics performance on mini-notebooks and offer better HD video playback, but now we have some hard data. We’re in the process of testing the Mini 311 for our full review, and the first test results are in. Let’s compare Ion’s scores to those of the average <a class="zem_slink" title="Netbook" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netbook">netbook</a> with <a class="zem_slink" title="Intel Corporation" rel="geolocation" href="http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=37.3879277778,-121.963538889&amp;spn=0.01,0.01&amp;q=37.3879277778,-121.963538889%20%28Intel%20Corporation%29&amp;t=h">Intel</a>’s graphics, as well as more expensive ultraportables powered by Intel’s <a class="zem_slink" title="Ultra low voltage" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultra_low_voltage">ULV</a> processor.</p>
<p>We started with <a class="zem_slink" title="PCMark" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCMark">PCMark</a> 05, which measures overall application performance in <a class="zem_slink" title="Windows XP" rel="homepage" href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/windowsxp/">Windows XP</a>. The Mini 311 notched a score of 1,917 on PCMark05, which is almost 500 points above the current netbook average of 1,423. The highest netbook score we’ve ever seen in that test is 1697 for the Dell latitude 2100 ($394.00). Once we get in Ion netbooks that run <a class="zem_slink" title="Windows" rel="homepage" href="http://www.microsoft.com/WINDOWS">Windows</a> 7 ($119.99), we’ll do a direct comparison with ULV-based ultraportables using the PCMark Vantage benchmark.</p>
<p>The MIni 311 produced an even more impressive score in 3DMark06, which measures graphics performance: 1,386. That showing is over 1,200 points above the netbook average. The only netbook to beat this score was the <a class="zem_slink" title="Asus" rel="homepage" href="http://www.asus.com/">ASUS</a> N10Jc, and that had switchable Nvidia graphics. The only other system that comes close is 256 points away, the <a class="zem_slink" title="NYSE: AMD" rel="stockexchange" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=AMD">AMD</a>-powered Gateway LT3103u.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://blog.laptopmag.com/hp-mini-311-first-test-results-is-ion-worth-it">HP Mini 311 First Test Results: Is Ion Worth It?</a>.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/5cdfb402-bef3-4a0c-b8b4-45362c7421bb/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=5cdfb402-bef3-4a0c-b8b4-45362c7421bb" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://netputing.com/2009/10/06/hp-mini-311-first-test-results-is-ion-worth-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medion rolls out AMD-based Akoya Mini E1312 netbook</title>
		<link>http://netputing.com/2009/07/06/medion-rolls-out-amd-based-akoya-mini-e1312-netbook/</link>
		<comments>http://netputing.com/2009/07/06/medion-rolls-out-amd-based-akoya-mini-e1312-netbook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[210U processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD mobile platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATI Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comparison of AMD chipsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GBP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low-power AMD Sempron 210U processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mini E1312]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radeon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sempron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology/Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netputing.com/?p=170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The AMD-based netbook train may have been a little slow to get out of the station, but it looks like it&#8217;s finally starting to pick up a bit of steam, with Medion the latest to roll out an offering of its own. That comes in the form of the company&#8217;s new Akoya [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/news.phtml/25321/medion-akoya-mini-e1312.phtml"><img style="border: 1px solid black; margin: 4px;" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/07/medion-akoya-mini-e1312-2.jpg" border="1" alt="" hspace="4" vspace="4" width="480" height="318" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/amd,netbook">AMD-based netbook train</a> may have been a little slow to get out of the station, but it looks like it&#8217;s finally starting to pick up a bit of steam, with Medion the latest to roll out an offering of its own. That comes in the form of the company&#8217;s new Akoya Mini E1312, which opts for a low-power AMD Sempron 210U processor and ATI Radeon Xpress 1250 graphics instead of the usual Intel combo. Otherwise, you can expect to get a 16:9 11.6-inch display, 1GB of RAM, a 160GB hard drive, HDMI out, and a six-cell or nine-cell battery. No word on a release &#8217;round here just yet, but folks in the UK will apparently be able to pick this one up exclusively at Aldi stores starting July 12th for £339.99 (or just under $550).</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/medion-rolls-out-amd-based-akoya-mini-e1312-netbook/">Medion rolls out AMD-based Akoya Mini E1312 netbook</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://netputing.com/2009/07/06/medion-rolls-out-amd-based-akoya-mini-e1312-netbook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nvidia&#8217;s Chief Executive Publicly Unveils Pricing of &#8220;Ion&#8221; Core-Logic &#8211; X-bit labs</title>
		<link>http://netputing.com/2009/07/04/nvidias-chief-executive-publicly-unveils-pricing-of-ion-core-logic-x-bit-labs/</link>
		<comments>http://netputing.com/2009/07/04/nvidias-chief-executive-publicly-unveils-pricing-of-ion-core-logic-x-bit-labs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 22:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atom chip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atom processors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business/Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief executive officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CUDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell Inspiron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GeForce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ion chip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jen-Hsun Huang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NVIDIA Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NVIDIA Ion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology/Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netputing.com/?p=164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Nvidia Corp.’s chief executive officer for the first time publicly unveiled pricing of the company’s GeForce 9400M single-chip core-logic better known as Ion. Based on the information provided by Jen-Hsun Huang now and several weeks ago, it transpires that Nvidia’s platform for Intel Atom processors is up to three times more expensive compared to Intel’s own [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://portablemonkey.com/images/uploads/articles/ion-3x.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="201" />Nvidia Corp.’s chief executive officer for the first time publicly unveiled pricing of the company’s GeForce 9400M single-chip core-logic better known as Ion. Based on the information provided by Jen-Hsun Huang now and several weeks ago, it transpires that Nvidia’s platform for Intel Atom processors is up to three times more expensive compared to Intel’s own platform.</p>
<p>“[The price of Nvidia Ion chip] is between $30 and $35. This is significant, but it is [needed] to have a good high definition video on the screen.” said Jen-Hsun Huang in an interview with <a href="http://blog.latribune.fr/blogpascalb/?p=506" target="_blank">La Tribune</a> news-paper.</p>
<p>Earlier this year Jen-Hsun Huang <a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/mainboards/display/20090518235131_Nvidia_Accuses_Intel_of_Unfair_Competition.html" target="_blank">said</a> that Intel sold its Atom processors for $45 a unit, however, if a customer wanted to get Atom chip and compatible core-logic set, it would get if for $25, which automatically reduces Nvidia’s availability to compete against Intel in the Atom-compatible core-logic market. If the GeForce 9400M/Ion costs from $30 to $35, then the whole bundle consisting of Intel Atom and Nvidia Ion costs from $75 to $80, which is up to 3.2 times higher compared to the cost of Intel’s default Atom package. Still, Nvidia’s core-logic set is much more advanced than Intel’s.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/mainboards/display/20090703091532_Nvidia_s_Chief_Executive_Publicly_Unveils_Pricing_of__Ion__Core_Logic.html">Read more&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://netputing.com/2009/07/04/nvidias-chief-executive-publicly-unveils-pricing-of-ion-core-logic-x-bit-labs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dell to ditch x86 for new ARM-powered netbook/MID hybrid device</title>
		<link>http://netputing.com/2009/06/30/dell-to-ditch-x86-for-new-arm-powered-netbookmid-hybrid-device-%e2%80%93-cell-phones-mobile-device-technology-news-updates-geek-com/</link>
		<comments>http://netputing.com/2009/06/30/dell-to-ditch-x86-for-new-arm-powered-netbookmid-hybrid-device-%e2%80%93-cell-phones-mobile-device-technology-news-updates-geek-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appropriate technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central processing unit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Itanium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Person Communication and Meetings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pocket-sized device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology/Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X86]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netputing.com/?p=130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Dell is reportedly developing a new pocket-sized device for “tapping into the Internet”. The device will run Google’s Android software (not Microsoft’s Windows) and will be powered by an ARM CPU (not Intel’s Atom, or VIA’s Nano). While the device will be similar to an iPod touch, though slightly larger, it too will be without cellphone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/dell_arm_this_much.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-820031" src="http://www.geek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/dell_arm_this_much.jpg" alt="dell_arm_this_much" width="290" height="173" /></a>Dell is reportedly developing a new pocket-sized device for “tapping into the Internet”. The device will run Google’s Android software (not Microsoft’s Windows) and will be powered by an ARM CPU (not Intel’s Atom, or VIA’s Nano). While the device will be similar to an iPod touch, though slightly larger, it too will be without cellphone abilities.</p>
<p>According to reports, Dell began working on the device last year after failing to develop a device capable of competing with Apple’s iPod music players. The device may be available later this year, though the insider told the Wall Street Journal that such a plan could be delayed or scrapped entirely.</p>
<p>Another interesting twist is that the device, targeted at a point between MIDs and netbooks, would not be powered by an x86 CPU, which is the majority of Dell’s sales are to date (with other CPUs including Intel’s Itanium, scrapped several years ago). In its place, Dell will be turning to an ARM CPU of undisclosed specification, power and ability (as there are several varieties of ARM CPUs for all kinds of tasks).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.geek.com/articles/mobile/dell-to-ditch-x86-for-new-arm-powered-netbookmid-hybrid-device-20090630/">Read more from source&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://netputing.com/2009/06/30/dell-to-ditch-x86-for-new-arm-powered-netbookmid-hybrid-device-%e2%80%93-cell-phones-mobile-device-technology-news-updates-geek-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel to begin to release game changing SSDs in two weeks &#124; 9 to 5 Mac</title>
		<link>http://netputing.com/2009/06/26/intel-to-begin-to-release-game-changing-ssds-in-two-weeks-9-to-5-mac/</link>
		<comments>http://netputing.com/2009/06/26/intel-to-begin-to-release-game-changing-ssds-in-two-weeks-9-to-5-mac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 01:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hard disk drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-volatile memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail  500GB laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solid-state drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology/Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netputing.com/?p=111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Inquirer reports that Intel is set to release a new round of SSDs which might bring hard drive replacements into the hands of many more laptop owners.</p>
<p class="rteindent1">We&#8217;ve been told that with these new 34nm NAND SSDs, users can expect higher performance, higher capacities, and most importantly, lower prices.  Amongst the 34nm offerings hot off [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://9to5mac.com/node/7063"><img style="margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px;" src="http://netputingcdn2.appspot.com/wp-content/uploads/HLIC/9to5mac.com/files/image/00000/intelssd-nand-34mm.jpg" alt="" hspace="10" align="right" /></a><a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1406326/intel-34nm-nand-ssds-launch-weeks">The Inquirer reports</a> that Intel is set to release a new round of SSDs which might bring hard drive replacements into the hands of many more laptop owners.</p>
<p class="rteindent1"><em>We&#8217;ve been told that with these new 34nm NAND SSDs, users can expect higher performance, higher capacities, and most importantly, lower prices.  Amongst the 34nm offerings hot off the production line will be a 320GB drive, plus 160GB and 80GB capacities too. But there very well could be more. Our sources tell us there will be drives big enough to replace the HDDs</em><strong><em> in most, if not all laptops.</em></strong></p>
<p>That is a pretty bold statement, especially with retail <a href="http://tinyurl.com/saffron-hd">500GB laptop hard drives falling significantly below the $100 price point.</a> Currently, the best retail <a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/ssd-kingston">SSD price/GB ratio of SSDs has been $227/128GB</a>.  That is a lot of space and a lot of $ difference.</p>
<p><a href="http://9to5mac.com/intel-ssd-43-nm">Intel to begin to release game changing SSDs in two weeks | 9 to 5 Mac</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://netputing.com/2009/06/26/intel-to-begin-to-release-game-changing-ssds-in-two-weeks-9-to-5-mac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nokia orders netbooks and smartbooks from Quanta and Compal, first model may launch Q3</title>
		<link>http://netputing.com/2009/06/24/breaking-nokia-orders-netbooks-and-smartbooks-from-quanta-and-compal-first-model-may-launch-q3/</link>
		<comments>http://netputing.com/2009/06/24/breaking-nokia-orders-netbooks-and-smartbooks-from-quanta-and-compal-first-model-may-launch-q3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AnandChandrasekher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nokia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qualcomm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snapdragon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netputing.com/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Nokia Oyj ordered netbook computers from Quanta Computer Inc. and Compal Electronics Inc., the Commercial Times reported, without saying where it got the information.</p>
<p>The Quanta netbook will use Intel Corp.’s Atom chip and will go on sale in the third quarter at the earliest, the Taipei-based, Chinese-language newspaper said.</p>
<p>Compal will make the so-called smartbook computer for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2009/06/24/breaking-nokia-orders-netbooks-from-quanta-and-compal.html"><img class="alignnone" title="BREAKING: Nokia orders netbooks and smartbooks from Quanta and Compal, first model may launch Q3" src="http://images.intomobile.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/nokia_netbook.jpg" alt="nokia netbook BREAKING: Nokia orders netbooks and smartbooks from Quanta and Compal, first model may launch Q3" width="350" height="304" /></a></p>
<p><a class="zem_slink" title="Nokia" rel="homepage" href="http://nokia.com">Nokia</a> Oyj ordered netbook computers from Quanta Computer Inc. and Compal Electronics Inc., the Commercial Times reported, without saying where it got the information.</p>
<p><strong>The Quanta netbook will use Intel Corp.’s Atom chip and will go on sale in the third quarter at the earliest, the Taipei-based, Chinese-language newspaper said.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Compal will make the so-called smartbook computer for Nokia using Qualcomm Inc.’s Snapdragon chip, the newspaper said.</strong></p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/43ad04e0-eb01-4cae-bd80-694bc2a217ad/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=43ad04e0-eb01-4cae-bd80-694bc2a217ad" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://netputing.com/2009/06/24/breaking-nokia-orders-netbooks-and-smartbooks-from-quanta-and-compal-first-model-may-launch-q3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Intel Classmate worth the price?</title>
		<link>http://netputing.com/2009/06/24/new-intel-classmate-worth-the-price/</link>
		<comments>http://netputing.com/2009/06/24/new-intel-classmate-worth-the-price/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Classmate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small form factor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablet PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netputing.com/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"></p>
<p>The Classmate (whether the convertible tablet or traditional, rugged “clamshell”) is more expensive than the average netbook. Intel would like you to believe that the ruggedness, form factor, usability, and hardware/software ecosystem add enough value that a premium price is justified.</p>
<p>The prices, in fact, are hardly “premium” ($500 for a small form-factor, rugged Windows [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-45" title="classmate" src="http://netputingcdn1.appspot.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/classmate.JPG" alt="classmate" width="635" height="390" /></p>
<p>The Classmate (whether the convertible tablet or traditional, rugged “clamshell”) is more expensive than the average netbook. <a class="zem_slink" title="Intel Corporation" rel="geolocation" href="http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=37.3879277778,-121.963538889&amp;spn=0.01,0.01&amp;q=37.3879277778,-121.963538889%20%28Intel%20Corporation%29&amp;t=h">Intel</a> would like you to believe that the ruggedness, form factor, usability, and hardware/software ecosystem add enough value that a premium price is justified.</p>
<p>The prices, in fact, are hardly “premium” ($500 for a small form-factor, rugged Windows tablet would be competitive if any other such devices existed on the market). While anyone who has ever used a current-generation Classmate knows that bargain basement netbooks won’t survive the same 60cm drops, don’t include classroom management software, aren’t validated with a variety of scientific hardware and software, and can’t provide an out-of-the-box turnkey solution for a lab or a 1:1 program.</p>
<p>Bigger batteries? A high-definition screen? A more natural handwriting experience? What would make you spend more to outfit a classroom?</p>
<p>There is lot of value in the Classmate, particularly the convertible tablet.</p>
<p><a href="http://education.zdnet.com/?p=2714">More via source</a></p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/f8489398-ba99-4604-8649-fb249b130434/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=f8489398-ba99-4604-8649-fb249b130434" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://netputing.com/2009/06/24/new-intel-classmate-worth-the-price/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Impressions of the 11.6-Inch Gateway LT3100 with AMD Inside</title>
		<link>http://netputing.com/2009/06/23/first-impressions-of-the-11-6-inch-gateway-lt3100-with-amd-inside/</link>
		<comments>http://netputing.com/2009/06/23/first-impressions-of-the-11-6-inch-gateway-lt3100-with-amd-inside/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AmdAthlon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Athlon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Buy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radeon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netputing.com/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>There may be reports that Acer is skeptical about putting out its 11.6 inch Aspire One on shelves, but its brother Gateway seems to be sliding into the same space. However, Gateway also seems to be shaking up the specs on the inside of its 11.6-inch LT3100 by forgoing an Intel solution (nor Atom or CULV) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://netputing.com//homepages/38/d91226333/htdocs/netputing/wp-content/uploads/HLIC/blog.laptopmag.com/wpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/gateway.jpg" alt="" width="270" height="253" /></p>
<p>There may be reports that Acer is skeptical about putting out its 11.6 inch Aspire One on shelves, but its brother Gateway seems to be sliding into the same space. However, Gateway also seems to be shaking up the specs on the inside of its 11.6-inch LT3100 by forgoing an Intel solution (nor Atom or CULV) for an AMD Athlon processor.</p>
<p>The Gateway LT3103u will be available at <a class="zem_slink" title="Best Buy" rel="homepage" href="http://www.bestbuy.com/">Best Buy</a>, according to the company’s site, and will start for $399. It will be outfitted with a 1.2GHz AMD Athlon 64 CPU, ATI Radeon X1270 graphics, Windows Vista Home Basic SP1, 2GB of RAM and a 250GB hard drive.</p>
<p>We caught a glimpse of the LT3100’s hardware at Computex earlier this month. The chassis while very similar to the 11.6-inch Acer Aspire One  has a few key differences. Firstly the lid is styled after Gateway’s MD or MC Series. The glossy black and red units that were on display have a silver buckle centered on the top of the lid. Nevertheless, it has the same compact build and is 1.03-inches thick and weighs just about 3 pounds.</p>
<p>Underneath the lid the LT3100 has the same 11.6 1366 x 768 resolution, LED-backlit display as the Acer. It also has the same  full size keyboard which is quite comfortable; we like the small spacing between the flat keys. The trackpad is styled slightly different, and has a scroll bar and silver, single mouse button. We are looking forward to testing the LT3100 especially given its AMD organs.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.laptopmag.com/first-impressions-of-the-116-inch-gateway-lt3100-with-amd-inside">Via</a></p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/e00b9109-f25c-4759-a174-b2a38fe2f758/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=e00b9109-f25c-4759-a174-b2a38fe2f758" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://netputing.com/2009/06/23/first-impressions-of-the-11-6-inch-gateway-lt3100-with-amd-inside/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 7/44 queries in 0.023 seconds using apc
Object Caching 833/961 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via netputingcdn1.appspot.com

Served from: netputing.com @ 2012-02-08 15:51:57 -->
