<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Netputing &#187; MIni 311</title>
	<atom:link href="http://netputing.com/tag/mini-311/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://netputing.com</link>
	<description>Puting up with the Net</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 22:52:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>HP Mini 311 First Test Results: Is Ion Worth It?</title>
		<link>http://netputing.com/2009/10/06/hp-mini-311-first-test-results-is-ion-worth-it/</link>
		<comments>http://netputing.com/2009/10/06/hp-mini-311-first-test-results-is-ion-worth-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIni 311]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netputing.com/?p=306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It’s here, and it could redefine netbooks. The HP Mini 311, with Nvidia’s Ion LE Graphics chips are responsible for processing all images sent to your computer?s display.</p>
<p>Learn Moregraphics chip inside, arrived in our offices today. But how good is it?</p>
<p>For months you’ve been hearing that Ion will improve graphics performance on mini-notebooks and offer better [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span id="intelliTXT"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-20419" title="HP Mini 311" src="http://blog.laptopmag.com/wpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/HP-Mini-311-02.jpg" alt="HP Mini 311" width="250" /></span>It’s here, and it could redefine netbooks. The <a class="zem_slink" title="Hewlett-Packard" rel="homepage" href="http://www.hp.com">HP</a> Mini 311, with <a class="zem_slink" title="Nvidia" rel="geolocation" href="http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=37.3707277778,-121.963738889&amp;spn=0.01,0.01&amp;q=37.3707277778,-121.963738889%20%28Nvidia%29&amp;t=h">Nvidia</a>’s Ion LE Graphics chips are responsible for processing all images sent to your computer?s display.</p>
<p>Learn Moregraphics chip inside, arrived in our offices today. But how good is it?</p>
<p>For months you’ve been hearing that Ion will improve graphics performance on mini-notebooks and offer better HD video playback, but now we have some hard data. We’re in the process of testing the Mini 311 for our full review, and the first test results are in. Let’s compare Ion’s scores to those of the average <a class="zem_slink" title="Netbook" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netbook">netbook</a> with <a class="zem_slink" title="Intel Corporation" rel="geolocation" href="http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=37.3879277778,-121.963538889&amp;spn=0.01,0.01&amp;q=37.3879277778,-121.963538889%20%28Intel%20Corporation%29&amp;t=h">Intel</a>’s graphics, as well as more expensive ultraportables powered by Intel’s <a class="zem_slink" title="Ultra low voltage" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultra_low_voltage">ULV</a> processor.</p>
<p>We started with <a class="zem_slink" title="PCMark" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCMark">PCMark</a> 05, which measures overall application performance in <a class="zem_slink" title="Windows XP" rel="homepage" href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/windowsxp/">Windows XP</a>. The Mini 311 notched a score of 1,917 on PCMark05, which is almost 500 points above the current netbook average of 1,423. The highest netbook score we’ve ever seen in that test is 1697 for the Dell latitude 2100 ($394.00). Once we get in Ion netbooks that run <a class="zem_slink" title="Windows" rel="homepage" href="http://www.microsoft.com/WINDOWS">Windows</a> 7 ($119.99), we’ll do a direct comparison with ULV-based ultraportables using the PCMark Vantage benchmark.</p>
<p>The MIni 311 produced an even more impressive score in 3DMark06, which measures graphics performance: 1,386. That showing is over 1,200 points above the netbook average. The only netbook to beat this score was the <a class="zem_slink" title="Asus" rel="homepage" href="http://www.asus.com/">ASUS</a> N10Jc, and that had switchable Nvidia graphics. The only other system that comes close is 256 points away, the <a class="zem_slink" title="NYSE: AMD" rel="stockexchange" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=AMD">AMD</a>-powered Gateway LT3103u.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://blog.laptopmag.com/hp-mini-311-first-test-results-is-ion-worth-it">HP Mini 311 First Test Results: Is Ion Worth It?</a>.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/5cdfb402-bef3-4a0c-b8b4-45362c7421bb/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=5cdfb402-bef3-4a0c-b8b4-45362c7421bb" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://netputing.com/2009/10/06/hp-mini-311-first-test-results-is-ion-worth-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 9/12 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 283/283 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via netputingcdn1.appspot.com

Served from: netputing.com @ 2012-05-22 21:34:04 -->
